-
July 8, 2026
In the Equifax breach, one unpatched bug in a login form was all it took for attackers to walk away with the personal data of roughly 147 million people.
The cause was a known flaw in a web framework called Apache Struts that nobody had scanned for. This is what happens in the absence of good application security testing tools.
This guide walks you through a list of application security testing tools. It lays out what these tools do, the best ones on the market right now, an honest comparison table, and a checklist you can use before you buy or run anything.
We’ll also show where TestWheel’s security testing platform fits in, since automated scanning is something we build for teams every day.
What Is Application Security Testing?
Application security testing is the process of evaluating an application’s code, configuration, and runtime behavior to identify security weaknesses, such as injection flaws, broken authentication, or misconfigurations, before an attacker can exploit them.
By detecting security gaps such as insecure code, authentication issues, and data exposure, security testing enables development teams to fix bugs early and reduce security risks.
We’ve covered this in more depth in our guide on what application security testing is and how it works.
Application security testing tools enable QA teams to run these security tests without burning out their team or missing deadlines.
Best Application Security Testing Tools in 2026
The best application security testing tools are ones that fit right into your team’s use cases and offer the highest overarching value for the lowest human effort.
1. TestWheel
TestWheel works as one platform covering web, API, mobile, desktop, performance, and security testing together. Security scanning sits next to the same functional and API tests your QA team already runs.
TestWheel’s automated security testing runs on OWASP ZAP.
This application security testing tool works in two layers. Passive scanning reads live traffic in the background and flags things like missing security headers, leaked version details in server responses, and cookies missing the Secure or HttpOnly flags that protect a login session from being hijacked.
Active scanning goes further and sends test attacks, including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, command injection, path traversal, and CRLF injection, to see how the app reacts.
You can dial the intensity up or down depending on which part of the app you’re testing.
It supports form-based login, API token authentication, and script-based login for more complex sign-in flows. Its spidering feature crawls JavaScript-heavy apps and single-page applications, mapping URLs a basic crawler would not see.
Reports come out in HTML, XML, or JSON, each with a risk score and fix recommendation attached.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | API Testing Limit | Users |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | $10/month | Up to 10 APIs | 1 |
| Pro / Team | $30/month | Up to 100 APIs | Up to 5 |
| Enterprise | Custom | Unlimited | Unlimited |
2. OWASP ZAP
This is a free, open-source application security testing tool that many commercial platforms, including TestWheel, are built on top of.
It’s completely free with no paid tiers.
The tool works as a proxy between your browser and the app, crawling pages and flagging issues in the background before you ever run a real attack scan. It takes some manual setup, and reviewers often mention that it throws a fair number of false positives that need a second look.
But OWASP is still one of the best starting points for anyone learning dynamic application security testing from zero.
Pricing
Free, open-source.
3. Burp Suite
Burp Suite is among the most popular application security testing tools used by penetration testers.
The free Community Edition gives you the core manual tools, but it’s limited. There’s no automated scanner, and Intruder (the fuzzing tool used for brute-forcing and payload testing) is so throttled that it is impractical for real work.
The Professional plan unlocks the full automated scanner, unthrottled Intruder, Burp AI, and an assistant that helps explain findings and speeds up repetitive validation work using a credit system.
There’s also a separate CI/CD-focused edition called Burp Suite DAST(Static Application Security Testing). It fits perfectly for teams that want scheduled, automated scanning across many applications.
The tool is Java-based, so it eats up memory on anything under 16GB of RAM. The learning curve is fairly steep.
Pricing
Subscriptions are personalized. You’ll have to contact Sales and outline your needs.
For Burp Suite Professional, the cost depends on the number of users.
4. Veracode
Veracode’s static analysis is unique, and what this application security testing tool mostly stands out for.
Instead of reading your source code directly, it scans compiled binaries. That is especially relevant for banks, hospitals, and government contractors who don’t want to hand their raw source code to a third-party vendor.
The most common complaint across reviews for this static application security testing tool is scan speed. Several users describe waiting far longer for results than they expect from a modern tool. On the upside, Veracode Fix, which is its AI remediation feature, generates pull requests automatically for dependency vulnerabilities.
Pricing
Veracode does not publish standard list pricing; instead, they use custom, annual, application-based contracts.
5. Checkmarx One
Checkmarx is an application security testing tool largely dedicated to static analysis. It is built for security teams first, developers second.
It’s taint analysis traces how untrusted data moves through a program step by step, and can find complex, multi-file vulnerability chains that lighter tools miss.
This static application security testing tool also has a reputation for a high false-positive rate out of the box, which means someone on your team needs to spend time tuning it before it is useful day to day. If you’re a large organization with a dedicated AppSec team and a compliance mandate, that tradeoff is usually worth it.
If you’re a five-person startup, this is not the application security testing tool for you.
Pricing
Checkmarx One uses custom, quote-based subscriptions based on the number of developer seats, protected applications, and scan volume.
6. Snyk
Snyk’s biggest strength is dependency scanning (SCA). Its vulnerability database is one of the fastest in the industry at incorporating newly disclosed CVEs, often within 24 hours.
Its “reachability analysis” checks whether a vulnerable function in a dependency is actually called by your code. This reduces the number of alerts for problems that can’t be exploited in your specific app.
Its static analysis engine, Snyk Code, uses an AI model (DeepCode) trained on over 25 million real-world data flow examples rather than hand-written rules. It’s fast, but multiple independent comparisons note that it’s less mature than dedicated SAST(Static Application Security Testing) tools like Checkmarx for deep, cross-file vulnerability chains.
Snyk is cloud-only with no self-hosted option. It doesn’t make sense for organizations needing air-gapped environments. Its four main products (Code, Open Source, Container, IaC) are priced and sold separately.
Pricing
Free plan available.
Team plan starts at $25 / month per contributing developer.
Ignite plan starts at $1,260 / year per contributing developer.
The Enterprise plan comes with custom pricing.
7. SonarQube
SonarQube started as a code quality tool, not a security tool. Most of the tool focuses on code smells, duplication, and test coverage.
Its signature feature is the Quality Gate, a pass/fail threshold that blocks a pull request from merging if the code doesn’t meet defined standards.
The free Community Build covers the basics, but skips pull request comments and branch analysis. Those features come in the Developer Edition, priced by lines of code. This model will grow your bill as your codebase does.
Pricing
Free plan available.
Team plan starts at $34 monthly.
Enterprise plan comes with custom pricing.
8. Invicti
Invicti’s headline feature is proof-based scanning. Instead of just flagging a possible SQL injection or cross-site scripting flaw, it attempts a safe, controlled exploit to confirm the vulnerability is real.
Invicti Security is the parent company formed by merging two separate products, Netsparker and Acunetix. A 2025 acquisition called Kondukto brings along its ASPM layer, which is a dashboard that pulls in findings from over 110 other security tools and de-duplicates them into one queue.
Pricing
Pricing is enterprise-only and unpublished.
9. Acunetix
Acunetix is Invicti’s sibling product, aimed at smaller organizations that want strong automated scanning without the full enterprise ASPM layer.
Reviewers consistently praise how clean the reporting is and how quickly it flags common issues like SQL injection and misconfigurations. It’s one of the few application security testing tools to be able to do that.
The same reviews also mention scans slowing systems down on larger, more complex applications, so it’s worth testing scan times against your actual app before committing to a contract.
There’s also AcuSensor, a lightweight sensor you install alongside your PHP, .NET, or Java code that works with the external scan to confirm a vulnerability from the inside and point to the exact line of code causing it. This is helpful for reducing the guesswork DAST tools normally leave you with.
It can also run on-premises on Windows as well as in the cloud.
Pricing
Pricing is custom and unpublished.
10. Qualys WAS
Qualys Web Application Scanning is one module inside the much larger Qualys Cloud Platform, which also covers vulnerability management, compliance auditing, and asset discovery. If your security or IT team already uses Qualys for other things, adding WAS means everything shows up in one dashboard.
Qualys is an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) for PCI DSS, which is important for businesses looking for application security testing tools aligned with compliance mandates. Reviews say that false positives show up without a way to tune scan sensitivity down, and initial setup takes longer than some competitors.
For very large applications, Qualys uses progressive scanning, breaking the job into stages instead of trying to finish in one pass. If an app is behind a firewall and isn’t reachable from the public internet, Qualys releases a small virtual scanner appliance inside your network that reports results back to the cloud dashboard. That way, internal tools get the same coverage as public-facing ones.
WAS also bundles malware detection scanning at no extra cost, crawling your live site for injected malicious code that could get your domain blacklisted by search engines.
Pricing
Pricing depends on your selection of Cloud Platform Apps, the number of network addresses (IPs), web applications, and user licenses.
Application Security Testing Tools Comparison
| Tool | Type | Setup Effort | Standout Strength | Deployment | Best Team Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestWheel | DAST via OWASP ZAP, plus functional testing | Low, no-code | One platform for functional, API, and security testing together | Cloud (SaaS) | Mid-size to enterprise QA teams |
| OWASP ZAP | DAST | Medium | Completely free, no paid tier hiding behind it | Self-hosted or Docker | Solo developers, any team size |
| Burp Suite | DAST, manual pentesting | High | Deep manual control for real penetration testing | Desktop app, plus a separate cloud DAST edition | Solo pentesters to enterprise security teams |
| Veracode | SAST, DAST, SCA | Medium | Scans compiled binaries, so you never share source code | Cloud (SaaS) | Large enterprises |
| Checkmarx One | SAST, SCA, API | Medium-High | Thorough taint analysis across complex code paths | Cloud (SaaS) | Large enterprises with a dedicated AppSec team |
| Snyk | SCA, SAST | Low | Fast CVE database updates, often within 24 hours | Cloud (SaaS) | Startups to mid-size development teams |
| SonarQube | SAST, code quality | Low-Medium | Quality Gates block bad code before it merges | Self-hosted or SonarQube Cloud | Small teams to large enterprises |
| Invicti | DAST, ASPM | Medium-High | Proof-based scanning confirms exploits are real | Cloud, with on-premises available | Large enterprises |
| Acunetix | DAST | Medium | AcuSensor pinpoints the exact vulnerable line of code | Cloud or on-premises (Windows) | Mid-size teams |
| Qualys WAS | DAST | Medium | One dashboard across security and compliance modules | Cloud, plus a virtual appliance for internal apps | Mid-size to large enterprises |
Checklist for Running a Proper Security Test
A tool is only as good as the test you run with it. Here’s a checklist that covers everything you need to run application security tests.
- Map the whole testable surface first. List every login page, form, upload button, and API endpoint before you scan anything.
- Layer more than one test type. Combine static analysis, dynamic testing, and a dependency check instead of relying on just one kind of test.
- Test behind the login. Scan with a real signed-in test account. Just testing the public pages won’t be enough.
- Cover the highest-risk categories. At minimum, check for injection flaws, broken authentication, exposed data, and misconfigurations, the categories behind most real breaches,
- Include third-party code. Most apps run on open-source packages, so check those too, along with your own code.
- Test in a production-like environment. A stripped-down local setup can hide configuration issues that real settings would catch. Test on real browsers and devices for reliable results.
- Document, fix, and re-test. Keep an eye on the exact location, severity, and reproduction steps for each finding, set a deadline for fixes, then confirm that the patch actually worked.
- Repeat on a schedule, not once. A single pre-launch test misses everything that changes afterward. Repeat your tests.
Where TestWheel Fits In
TestWheel’s security testing is built around real use cases that QA and dev teams run into constantly. These include:
- authenticated scans for anything behind a login
- scans that trigger automatically inside a CI/CD pipeline
- security regression testing to confirm a fixed bug stays fixed
- scan policies tailored to the riskiest parts of a specific app
- ongoing vulnerability tracking
Many teams run one big scan, fix what they find, and never check whether the same issues creep back in later. TestWheel keeps a running record, so security is tracked continuously.
For more, see our guide on web application security testing, and our list of web application security requirements if you’re building your own security checklist.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are application security testing tools?
Application security testing tools are software programmes that automatically check applications for weak spots, like unprotected forms or code that lets an attacker sneak in.
2. What’s the difference between SAST and DAST?
SAST reads your source code without running it, catching mistakes early. DAST tests the app while it’s live, the way a real attacker would. Most serious QA teams use both.
3. Is OWASP ZAP actually free to use?
Yes, completely. It is open source with no paid tiers, and several commercial platforms, including TestWheel, build features on top of it.
4. How much do application security testing tools cost?
Open-source tools like OWASP ZAP cost nothing but take time to configure. Commercial platforms run from a small monthly fee to several thousand dollars, depending on scope.
5. Can a small team run application security testing without hiring a security expert?
Yes. No-code and low-code platforms are built so QA testers and developers without formal security training can run scans and understand the results.
6. What is automated application security testing?
Automated application security testing refers to the act of running security scans automatically as part of your build or release process. It catches new issues faster and keeps results consistent.
7. Is application security testing the same thing as penetration testing?
Not entirely. Application security testing tools run automated scans regularly. Penetration testing usually involves a human expert manually trying to break in, often a few times a year.